“OCU hierarch”: Epiphany neglects church canons and episcopal oath

Joasaph Shibaev, Filaret and Epiphany. Photo: Vidomosti

The “hierarch” of the OCU, Joasaph Shibaev, commented on Epiphany’s decree on the removal of the Intercession church of Kiev from Filaret's jurisdiction and stated that this step does not comply with any norms of canonical law. He placed the corresponding post on his Facebook page.

“The ruling hierarch of the capital’s eparchy, His Holiness Patriarch Filaret, by his decree, banned Archpriest A. Trofimliuk in ministry. All orders of the ruling bishop are obligatory for his clerics, they are canonical and lawful,” said Shibaev.

He commented on the words of Epiphany that the orders on the UOC KP official letterheads are invalid in the OCU and considered these arguments to be contrary to law.

“No one has the right to cancel them, except the Church Court. Even if they were written on a scrap of a newspaper or, even, given orally with reliable witnesses, the “metropolitan” writes. “The arguments of the Primate that the patriarchal eparchy has not yet been re-registered, that the decrees issued on the letterhead of the UOC KP are not legally binding, in his opinion, are simply canonically illiterate. Or the Primate deliberately and defiantly violates them."

Based on the above, Joasaph Shibaev severely criticized Epiphany and accused him of neglecting the canons:

“How else can we more clearly demonstrate a complete disregard, and perhaps, just ignorance of the canon law? This is not only disregard for the canons, but also for the bishop's oath given before the Cross and the Gospel, which states that the bishop cannot interfere in the affairs of other dioceses. Apparently, Vladyka Epiphany believes that a Primate has nothing to do with the rule of canon law and the requirements of the bishop's oath! Unceremoniously interfering in the affairs of the patriarchal eparchy, the Primate renders himself guilty and defendant before the Church Court.”

Recall that at the end of May, a new conflict broke out between Epiphany and Filaret. Filaret, as a chancellor of the Kiev Eparchy of the OCU, found it necessary to ban the rector of the Intercession temple Alexander Trofimliuk (who is also a rector of the Theological Academy of the OCU and Epiphany’s aide) from priesthood and appoint another "priest" to this post. In response, Epiphany issued a decree whereby he transferred the above temple from the jurisdiction of Filaret to his administration. He substantiated his decision with the fact that the documents, published on behalf of the UOC KP, are no longer valid.

Read also

In Ukraine, Trump’s 'spiritual advisor' reassured of religious freedom

Pastor Mark Burns stated that Ukraine, despite the war, is a "beacon of religious freedom."

Lavra brethren congratulate Metropolitan Pavel on 31 years as abbot

The monks of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra have expressed hope that they will soon be able to pray again with their abbot.

Amsterdam: Intrusion into Lavra Caves – a return to Soviet-era persecution

International lawyer Robert Amsterdam has condemned the actions of Ukraine’s Ministry of Culture regarding the inspection of holy relics in the Caves of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, calling it a violation of religious freedom.

Over 20 EU states condemn Hungary for ban on LGBT propaganda among children

“This restricts the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression,” diplomats state in a joint declaration.

His Beatitude officiates consecration of Bishop of Rakhiv

At the Church of St. Agapitus in the Lavra, the Primate of the UOC ordained a vicar for the Khust Eparchy.

Met Victor: It is painful to see Lavra's relics turned into test subjects

According to the bishop, there is particular concern over how members of the scientific commission will handle the holy relics.