Pat Kirill: It's time to give a theological assessment of Phanar’s actions

The head of Phanar with the Ukrainian schismatics recognized by him. Photo: pomisna.info

What is needed is a theological analysis of what is happening in Ecumenical Orthodoxy today. The Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church, His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Rus, said this when opening the conference "World Orthodoxy: Primacy and Conciliarity in the Light of the Orthodox Doctrine", Patriarchia.ru reports.

He stressed that the ecclesiological tendencies promoted by Phanar, which used to raise concerns, today have caused significant damage to the relationship of the Churches. An especially dangerous and grave violation of the canonical order was the invasion of the Patriarchate of Constantinople into the territory of another Local Church – Ukraine.

“This invasion can really have disastrous consequences that could destroy relations between the Local Churches,” noted the Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. “Meanwhile, in the history of the Church there have often been cases when critical situations gave impetus for a more thorough understanding of the doctrine and various practical issues of church life. I am convinced that we need a theological analysis of what is happening in Ecumenical Orthodoxy nowadays."

In this regard, the Patriarch explained how he sees the goals and objectives of this conference.

First, it is necessary to analyze and see ecclesiological reasons for the current crisis. In his opinion, “it is necessary to correlate the understanding of primacy and conciliarity, which is today articulated by Constantinople, with the primordial understanding enshrined in the Tradition of the Church. This is the most important thing: we can prove the erroneous position of Constantinople only by correlating this current position with what has always taken place in the Orthodox Church in terms of being aware of the role and significance of the former."

Secondly, "it is necessary to evaluate, theologically and canonically, those acts that result from misunderstanding of primacy." For this end, it is important to carefully consider, among other things, the political context of the “granting of autocephaly to the OCU” – “the schismatic structure with which the Patriarch of Constantinople tried to replace the actually existing Ukrainian Orthodox Church."

Thirdly, the analysis of the problems that have arisen should be carried out in the context of the history of the Church, since "from the relationship of the Local Orthodox Churches in the past, from their position in a particular state, one can learn lessons that will be useful in our time."

“Finally, it is important to once again comprehend what the church schism means and how the Local Churches should react to it. Is it permissible to enter into prayer and Eucharistic communion with schismatics? What canonical consequences does such an introduction entail? Can an ecclesiastical authority be considered as legitimate if it violated the church system through concelebration with schismatics and self-ordained persons who do not have canonical consecration?

Of course, church canons give quite comprehensive answers to all these questions. But how to apply these canons in practice? What exactly do they mean in the current situation? Where are the boundaries of oikonomia, and where should akribeia begin? I hope that the participants in this conference will reflect on this topic as well,” the Patriarch explained.

It is important that not only the hierarchs of the Churches, but also representatives of the academic theological community from different countries who also take part in the conference, give an assessment of the attempts to legalize the schism, he added.

“I hope that their voice will be heard where the schism is widening and  eepening today. Let us try to stop it by joint efforts in order ‘to bring so many parts divided among themselves back to the unity of the Church’, according to the words of St. Basil the Great,” summed up the Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church.

The UOJ wrote that on September 16, 2021, a conference on the topic of primacy and conciliarity in the Church began work in Moscow. At the opening, the Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church emphasized that the Head of the Church is Christ, not the Patriarch of Constantinople.

Read also

In Ukraine, Trump’s 'spiritual advisor' reassured of religious freedom

Pastor Mark Burns stated that Ukraine, despite the war, is a "beacon of religious freedom."

Lavra brethren congratulate Metropolitan Pavel on 31 years as abbot

The monks of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra have expressed hope that they will soon be able to pray again with their abbot.

Amsterdam: Intrusion into Lavra Caves – a return to Soviet-era persecution

International lawyer Robert Amsterdam has condemned the actions of Ukraine’s Ministry of Culture regarding the inspection of holy relics in the Caves of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, calling it a violation of religious freedom.

Over 20 EU states condemn Hungary for ban on LGBT propaganda among children

“This restricts the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression,” diplomats state in a joint declaration.

His Beatitude officiates consecration of Bishop of Rakhiv

At the Church of St. Agapitus in the Lavra, the Primate of the UOC ordained a vicar for the Khust Eparchy.

Met Victor: It is painful to see Lavra's relics turned into test subjects

According to the bishop, there is particular concern over how members of the scientific commission will handle the holy relics.