Will Kyiv Lavra be renamed too after renaming Lavrska Street?

Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Photo: Katarin Tour

They argue that the Soviets sought to destroy the Church as an institution, while they do not. Instead, they claim to support the Church – but not the "Moscow" one, only the Ukrainian one.

Let’s set aside the dancing and shows in the Lavra, film screenings in the Chernihiv Cathedral, and so on. Instead, let’s focus on their latest initiative.

Twenty-five members of parliament have demanded that Vitali Klitschko rename Lavrska Street to Mazepa Street.

“Yanukovych has long fled to Russia, the activities of the ROC in Ukraine are banned. Yet the decision imposed by them on the city community is still in effect. This is abnormal and unacceptable,” stated Volodymyr Viatrovych.

To recap, in 2007, Kyiv City Council renamed January Uprising Street to Mazepa Street. However, in 2010, a section of the street (where the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra is located) was renamed Lavrska Street. Now, MPs want to reverse this decision.

Their argument is that Mazepa funded the construction of the All Saints Church in the Lavra, as well as the restoration of the Trinity Gate Church, the Dormition Cathedral, and more.

But where’s the logic? Suppose Mazepa was a great benefactor to the Lavra. Why destroy the street named after it, especially since the street practically consists only of the Lavra? What’s more important here – Mazepa or the Lavra? This is like proposing to rename Kyiv to Mazepa. Or better yet – the entire country of Ukraine. Why not? He did so much good for the nation!

On a serious note, this initiative clearly shows that our authorities are not fighting "Moscow priests" but rather the Church of Christ itself. They’ve already allowed the OCU into the Upper Lavra, monks are about to be evicted from the Lower Lavra, and access to the caves and relics of the saints has been closed off to the faithful. Isn’t that a "victory"?

But no, that’s not enough. The street must also be "canceled" so that even the memory of it is erased from the people.

Here’s a suggestion for Viatrovych’s next logical step: rename the Lavra to “Museum Town”. That’s exactly what the Bolsheviks did in their time. Why bother coming up with something new when you’re already following their blueprint to the letter?

Read also

Shaping “future of monasticism in Ukraine” while expelling monks. Seriously?

According to official data for 2021 (which has not been published since), the entire Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) has 233 monks. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) has about 4,700.

Atrocities of neo-communists in the Lavra

These actions are a litmus test to reveal how Orthodox Christians worldwide will react to this sacrilege.

On the OCU’s “informing” against Metropolitan Theodosiy

Let’s pause to reflect: Christians are reporting a fellow bishop to the authorities in an attempt to get him “shut down” – simply because he can celebrate divine services!

Illness or demonic possession?

The MP effectively labeled UOC parishioners abroad as spies because their husbands serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the women "may possess sensitive information relevant to national security."

On the criticism of peace negotiations by Uniates

Shevchuk claims to communicate with God and believes the Saviour "has a plan to save Ukraine".

About the fallen cross in the Lavra

The cross didn’t fall because a tornado swept through Kyiv – no, the weather was perfectly calm and quiet. Simply put, in the words of Klitschko, the cross "got tired."